NSGminer v0.9.2: The Fastest Feathercoin / NeoScrypt GPU Miner
-
I have optimised almost all bytewise parts of FastKDF. 800KH/s before with v7 beta, 820KH/s now (Catalyst 14.6) or 770KH/s (Catalyst 15.7).
-
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
-
@AmDD said:
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
what driver version are you using?
-
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
what driver version are you using?
14.7
-
@AmDD said:
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
what driver version are you using?
14.7
weird… i think that is what I am running, plain and simple -w 128 -I 16…I will check tonight
What clocks are yours set to? Im running 1110/1550 or higher…
-
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
what driver version are you using?
14.7
weird… i think that is what I am running, plain and simple -w 128 -I 16…I will check tonight
What clocks are yours set to? Im running 1110/1550 or higher…
Ill have to double check my settings but I think clocks are 1100/1600 or so.
-
Trying to compile on a custom Puppy Linux install (MinerPup).
... make[2]: Entering directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' CC nsgminer-miner.o In file included from miner.c:66: neoscrypt.h:9: error: redefinition of typedef ‘ullong’ miner.h:34: error: previous declaration of ‘ullong’ was here neoscrypt.h:12: error: redefinition of typedef ‘uchar’ miner.h:30: error: previous declaration of ‘uchar’ was here make[2]: *** [nsgminer-miner.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' make: *** [all] Error 2Any suggestions?
-
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
@RIPPEDDRAGON said:
@AmDD said:
Even with beta v7, Im floating around 320KH/s on my 7950s. I only saw a ~20-30KH/s increase.
what driver version are you using?
14.7
weird… i think that is what I am running, plain and simple -w 128 -I 16…I will check tonight
What clocks are yours set to? Im running 1110/1550 or higher…
-w 256 -I 13 -g 2 and 1050/1600 clocks on 14.7 drivers. I did see when I got home that the rig had shutdown and had issues booting back up. I reinstalled the drivers and tried -w 128. So far its slower but I’ll let it hash awhile to see what it does.
-
@UnklAdM said:
Trying to compile on a custom Puppy Linux install (MinerPup).
... make[2]: Entering directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' CC nsgminer-miner.o In file included from miner.c:66: neoscrypt.h:9: error: redefinition of typedef ‘ullong’ miner.h:34: error: previous declaration of ‘ullong’ was here neoscrypt.h:12: error: redefinition of typedef ‘uchar’ miner.h:30: error: previous declaration of ‘uchar’ was here make[2]: *** [nsgminer-miner.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/archive/nsgminer' make: *** [all] Error 2Any suggestions?
Edit miner.c and driver-cpu.c to include neoscrypt.h before miner.h, and update typedefs in miner.h to the following:
#if !(uchar)
typedef unsigned char uchar;
#endif
#if !(uint)
typedef unsigned int uint;
#endif
#if !(ullong)
typedef unsigned long long ullong;
#endif -
In the code a type is defined, that was previously defined in another part/module/file
Suggesstion:
Edit miner.h and comment out the lines defining the type ullong and uchar
Then try again.
[Edit]
Ghostlanders way is far more elegant :D -
@Wellenreiter said:
In the code a type is defined, that was previously defined in another part/module/file
Suggesstion:
Edit miner.h and comment out the lines defining the type ullong and uchar
Then try again.
[Edit]
Ghostlanders way is far more elegant :DTried that, that’s why I’m here. Thanks anyway! I’ll try the other fix when I get to the office
- UnklAdM.
-
@AmDD So I checked driver version…its reporting as 15.8 but I know I downgraded it to 14.6 rc2
also I am running at I 15 because I am under 400KH/s with I 16
-
NSGminer v0.9.2 released. Well optimised for any drivers. Enjoy.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712650.msg13953935#msg13953935
-
@ghostlander said:
NSGminer v0.9.2 released. Well optimised for any drivers. Enjoy.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712650.msg13953935#msg13953935
Thank you Ghostlander! I am not a miner, but will send you few more FTC later on :+1:
-
That fixed my slow r9 290!
-
oraleee… again…Big thumbs up…!
Also see that FTC price is changing… ;3)
hope it will climbing n stay above 0.00002BTC something…p/s - NSGminer v0.9.2 speed around 30 minutes running.
3 x R9 290, 1 x R9 290 Trix, Driver-15.7.1
http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img922/9353/xwiOFJ.jpg -
http://www.dualminer.com/iBeLink-DM384M-Dash-Miner_p_36.html
If what they advertise is true, 384MH/s for 715W and $2098 in cash, say good-bye to X11 GPU mining. A reference R9 280X outputs 2MH/s for maybe 150W. If they produce enough of these ASICs for themselves, they can do a 51% attack on any X11 coin including Dash.
-
@ghostlander said:
http://www.dualminer.com/iBeLink-DM384M-Dash-Miner_p_36.html
If what they advertise is true, 384MH/s for 715W and $2098 in cash, say good-bye to X11 GPU mining. A reference R9 280X outputs 2MH/s for maybe 150W. If they produce enough of these ASICs for themselves, they can do a 51% attack on any X11 coin including Dash.
You think that miner is legit or another preorder scam? It is from Dualminer…so it might be real.
-
@RIPPEDDRAGON Who knows. They say it’s in stock, not a pre-order.
-
Just ran some #s, its a super risky gamble and imo not worth it. Apparently the chip is on a 150nm process too, so hashrate will go up orders of magnitude on the next several gen x11 asics.
