\[Kickstart\] Link - The File Sharing Blockchain Protocol
-
[quote name=“chrisj” post=“47558” timestamp=“1388008771”]
If only Satoshi had made the code open source so that anyone could have a go at setting up a global dialogue with a self stabilising consensus and then let the people decide through their collective action who should win.If only it were easier to get to the top than it were to stay there. If only we weren’t ruled by tyrants at the mercy of their fear desperate for power and control.
[/quote]+1
I don’t want to sound alarmist - but it’s a cyclical thing. Historically speaking. And I see it happening to some extent with Bitcoin. The human aspect in its maintenance is prone to human fallacies - weaknesses - greed and ego.
-
[quote name=“mnstrcck” post=“47559” timestamp=“1388008994”]
+1I don’t want to sound alarmist - but it’s a cyclical thing. Historically speaking. And I see it happening to some extent with Bitcoin. The human aspect in its maintenance is prone to human fallacies - weaknesses - greed and ego.
[/quote]But those cycles are getting a lot shorter. And short enough to provide opportunity for adaptation within our own lifetimes rather than it being intergenerational. Change is the new normal and the rate of change is accelerating. Learn or die.
-
[quote name=“chrisj” post=“47558” timestamp=“1388008771”]
If only Satoshi had made the code open source so that anyone could have a go at setting up a global dialogue with a self stabilising consensus and then let the people decide through their collective action who should win.If only it were easier to get to the top than it were to stay there. If only we weren’t ruled by tyrants at the mercy of their fear desperate for power and control.
[/quote]Dat y I do dis: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382896.msg4115835#msg4115835]https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=382896.msg4115835#msg4115835[/url]
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47457” timestamp=“1387958608”]
It’s entirely possible.The short answer is: New blockchain.
The long answer is MUCH more interesting.
Because the coins are being destroyed, the existing ones become more valuable. As the rate of deflation increases, the cost of publishing skyrockets until it becomes unfeasible. Also, you’re rich.
But let’s do the math. If 15 bytes is 1 satoshi, there’s 336 million FTC possible. 336,000,000 * 10,000,000 = 3,360,000,000,000,000 bytes. or a little over a little over 3.3 exabytes.
And that the FTC blockchain. What about InifiniteCoin? DogeCoin? NotYetInventedCoin?
I think it’s a problem people will decide how to deal with later. You can’t stop people from spending coins, so it’s a problem for the free market to solve using free market dynamics, like supply and demand.
[/quote]I like the long answer, thank you for that! I think I’m just going to store and build my ftc holdings for at least 6 months and hopefully by then ftc will be worth at least 10 euro :)
-
I love the idea. I sent you some FTC Kevlar. Hope it helps!
-
I don’t like the deflationary part. I’m partial to something being valuable because people use it rather than because everyone’s running out of it and losing their minds running to the nearest supply of artificially scarce virtual diamonds.
Still these are the early days. We may have a case for situations where coins may be truly destroyed (as in an entire block goes poof and the block total goes down). But that’s just me.
-
I actually wished there would be a high level discussion going on on Reddit about Link. None did actually understood it so this wasn’t possible (from hearing saying, not really getting it myself either).
-
Things are going well.
The round of testing has revealed a number of changes I need to make before we go at this again, so the site is down for the next 8 hours while I finish my work day. Hopefully I’ll have time for it tonight and will get the site back up.
Number 1 thing that needs to change is a I need to sanitize magnet links. Tuck seems to have found a problem with really long links, and really half the data in there doesn’t belong anyway. Also I can probably pre-populate the name field.
After that, xss sanitation. I’ll keep you updated here. :)
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47713” timestamp=“1388094370”]
Things are going well.The round of testing has revealed a number of changes I need to make before we go at this again, so the site is down for the next 8 hours while I finish my work day. Hopefully I’ll have time for it tonight and will get the site back up.
Number 1 thing that needs to change is a I need to sanitize magnet links. Tuck seems to have found a problem with really long links, and really half the data in there doesn’t belong anyway. Also I can probably pre-populate the name field.
After that, xss sanitation. I’ll keep you updated here. :)
[/quote]Sweet. I posted the 3rd quarter of the FLUX model in the tech thread. Working on the last quarter. I’ll redo the proposal considering updated ideas. Would like to see ELI5 walkthroughs. We’re going to kick so much ass.
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47713” timestamp=“1388094370”]
Number 1 thing that needs to change is a I need to sanitize magnet links. Tuck seems to have found a problem with really long links, and really half the data in there doesn’t belong anyway.
[/quote]Thanks for turning, “I’m a moron”, into you needing to sanitize magnet links. ;)
-
Pretty soon, we’ll need to add [b]mRep[/b] to the forum code for Kevlar and zerodrama.
-
We’re back online.
For those of you that have the link, you’ll notice a new feature when publishing: Auto-meta-data extraction.
When you put a magnet link in the box, it will do the following:
[list]
[*]Strip the trackers
[*]Extract the name and populate the text box
[*]Try and generate some good keywords from the name
[/list]It also sanitizes any bad html. Although I think it may screw with magnet links. I’m not sure… see if you can click on what you publish in the search results. Someone please test this? I’m out of FTC from a long night of bug fixing.
The reasoning behind stripping the trackers is that they’re temporal, but the data is forever. There’s no guarantee that in 5 years those trackers will still be around, but in 5 years, that hash will still be that data. That means you must use DHT in your torrent client to find the initial list of trackers. This is, in my opinion, as it should be. Now trackers can come and go, but Link data is forever.
If you don’t yet have the link, we’re getting closer. Hopefully by January I will have something we can share with the world and be proud of.
Thank you everyone for your continued support. We’re nearing the end of the second milestone: A production service with a UI.
-
Shameless bump.
Keep it going guys.
Looks like we only have x amount of weeks left before the next major influx of users.
I think this will make some serious waves once people know and understand what this is all about.
Would also be really kewl to see other coins implement this into their own code.
So let’s say doge coin or another high unit low price coin adopts this, would you think people will publish using the other alt-coins considering it would cost less if that’s the case?
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47775” timestamp=“1388123758”]
We’re back online.For those of you that have the link, you’ll notice a new feature when publishing: Auto-meta-data extraction.
When you put a magnet link in the box, it will do the following:
[list]
[*]Strip the trackers
[*]Extract the name and populate the text box
[*]Try and generate some good keywords from the name
[/list]It also sanitizes any bad html. Although I think it may screw with magnet links. I’m not sure… see if you can click on what you publish in the search results. Someone please test this? I’m out of FTC from a long night of bug fixing.
The reasoning behind stripping the trackers is that they’re temporal, but the data is forever. There’s no guarantee that in 5 years those trackers will still be around, but in 5 years, that hash will still be that data. That means you must use DHT in your torrent client to find the initial list of trackers. This is, in my opinion, as it should be. Now trackers can come and go, but Link data is forever.
If you don’t yet have the link, we’re getting closer. Hopefully by January I will have something we can share with the world and be proud of.
Thank you everyone for your continued support. We’re nearing the end of the second milestone: A production service with a UI.
[/quote]Kev, I’m sending you the last of what’s in my wallet (it’s not much, 10 or so) at home so you can test it. If you need more when I’m at my set up tomorrow let me know.
-
It is screwing with Magnet links. :(
That’s unfortunate. I’ll fix it tonight. Until then publishing is broken, so please don’t use it.
-
I can’t believe user input wasn’t sanitised. It’s kindergarten coding. :-\
-
[quote name=“UKMark” post=“47895” timestamp=“1388179885”]
I can’t believe user input wasn’t sanitised. It’s kindergarten coding. :-\
[/quote]It is. That’s what’s screwing with magnet links. Because I’m using the browser’s built in loveliness, it’s converting & to & when it shouldn’t. I’ve not decided what approach is best to take with regards to this yet, but I’ll figure something out.
-
[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“47897” timestamp=“1388180076”]
[quote author=UKMark link=topic=5663.msg47895#msg47895 date=1388179885]
I can’t believe user input wasn’t sanitised. It’s kindergarten coding. :-\
[/quote]It is. That’s what’s screwing with magnet links. Because I’m using the browser’s built in loveliness, it’s converting & to & when it shouldn’t. I’ve not decided what approach is best to take with regards to this yet, but I’ll figure something out.
[/quote]ctype_alnum, It’s all I trust tbh.
-
Nah, the browser has this built into it. It’s cross platform (not PHP specific), it’s future proof without ever updating the code, and it’s 4 lines of code (in coffeescript):
[code]
escapeHtml = (str) ->
div = document.createElement(“div”)
div.appendChild document.createTextNode(str)
div.innerHTML
[/code]Since anyone can encode anything into the blockchain, it just makes sense to sanitize any output before displaying it, since you can’t ever trust the server to do the right thing. Since all output is appended to the DOM via client side templates, there’s a single point which all data must pass through before being rendered. This makes the whole design trivial and idiot-proof. You just need to handle the special cases of things that should be allowed but normally aren’t.
-
I doubt you could truthfully santise at DOM level. You are giving ball back, surely?.
