Distributed Autonomous Corporations {FTCDAC}

[gary]

I have used the document below to explain what a Dac is and not.

The future of the decentralized web

Distributed Autonomous Corporations (DACs), or Decentralized Autonomous Companies, are a generalization of the concept of a crypto-currency where the currency is backed by the services its miners perform rather than a real-world commodity like gold, oil, or, ahem, thin air. If we can barter for goods and services, why can’t we back currencies with goods or services?

DACs may be simultaneously viewed as crypto-currencies and crypto-equities (unmanned businesses). As businesses, they perform services intended to be valuable to their customers. Such services might include money transmission (Bitcoin), asset trading (BitShares), domain name services (DomainShares), or a thousand other business models sure to emerge as people realize that DACs are not mere â€Å"altcoins”.

DACs pay for the services they need (like computer resources and bandwidth) with shares of their own company â€Å"stock”. They charge for their services using those same shares. Finally, they transfer all profits they earn to their shareholders denominated in those same shares. To the extent that their services are in demand, those same shares will be in demand. Just like a brick and mortar and flesh and blood company.

To the outside world a DAC is nothing but a crypto-currency backed by the value of the services it provides. But as owners of shares in a DAC, you may be entitled to a share of the profits that DAC earns from providing those services. Every DAC will have its own terms and conditions. You can always choose to view your DAC shares polymorphically – either as spendable coins or as shares in a profitable, perhaps dividend-paying business. Just like light can be viewed as both a particle and a wave.

Bitcoin itself can be viewed as an early form of DAC. We are generalizing the concept for use in the open source community, building on Bitcoin’s proven technology. Bitcoin could be reimplemented as a full open standards-compliant DAC. Perhaps someday it will.

Distributed Autonomous Corporations have many advantages. DACs are…

Corporations – They are, and of a right ought to be, free and independent persons.
Autonomous – once up to speed; they no longer need (or heed) their creators.
Distributed – there are no central points of control or failure that can be attacked.
Transparent – their books and business rules are auditable by all.
Confidential – customer information is securely (and incorruptibly) protected.
Trustworthy – because no interaction with them depends on trust.
Fiduciaries – acting solely in their customers’ and shareholders’ interests.
Self-regulating – they obey their own rules like, well, robots.
Incorruptible – no one can exercise seductive or coercive influence over them.
Sovereign – over their digital resources. They don’t need governments to exist.
Metaphorically, DACs work very much like familiar BMFB corporations.

They can be non-profit, for-profit or both at the same time!
You can access their products and services on-line.
You can buy and sell their stocks and bonds.
Shareholders can earn dividends; bondholders can earn interest.
Behaviors, rules and by-laws can only change by stakeholder majorities.
After paying its expenses to those who supply its operating resources, all remaining profits are autonomously distributed to stakeholders according to each DAC’s published by-laws. Other DAC developers may implement and publish their own open source by-laws under their own business models. How well these business rules are received will affect the ability of their DACs to compete in the free marketplace.

{The Author and credit for this work above is Stan Larimer}

What i propose using the above statement is a DAC that decentralizes the electricity supply from energy companies to the customers at the cheapest price?
We track the price of electricity per kilowatt to FTC, miners mine FTC, anyone can buy electricity with FTC. asset trading {FTCshares} or assets {Dacshares}.
Its just an idea, i do have more information, but i wanted to see what the Feathercoin community thought.
Please fill in any gaps. Some of the wording might seem strange, but if you understand what the author is saying certain words have regulations.

Regards

Gary

[Thytos]

The idea seems pretty interesting, as it will give coins yet another purpose while actually helping to decentralize certain commodities… I would like to hear from our tech fellows wether this can be easily implemented in FTC.