New Trollbox Tactic: You deadcoin are spam the vote!
-
[quote name=“randomdef” post=“16079” timestamp=“1371528989”]
does that make your begging any less pathetic?not really, but if being pathetic once was good enough for LTC! then being sad and pathetic twice is what FTC was cloned to do!
[/quote]who is begging?
even if it was with ltc…if it worked shouldnt it be tried again? could it hurt? oh right hurt your ego/pride :P
-
The best is “FTC is a pump and dump” and “scam coin” and watching those same people on Sunday in BTC-e Trollbox posting “LTC is going to gox today” just because Gox had an outtage
Hypocrites
-
[quote name=“justabitoftime” post=“16081” timestamp=“1371529392”]
[quote author=randomdef link=topic=1992.msg16079#msg16079 date=1371528989]
does that make your begging any less pathetic?not really, but if being pathetic once was good enough for LTC! then being sad and pathetic twice is what FTC was cloned to do!
[/quote]So this is what the kids call trolling eh?
‘Neat-o’
No-one is this oblivious to the idea of grassroots.
[/quote]It isnt trolling. FTC is a LTC clone, fact. You all stated that you don’t mind the FTC chat and pump because LTC did it.
That’s cool with me, but you can’t say its cool because LTC did it without really hitting home the fact that the entire code base is a carbon copy, WHICH ISNT A BAD THING. You are all very sensitive when you are called out on the truth.
-
It’s pretty amazing how absent the cognitive dissonance is in the trollbox. Either these people are actually stupid or they think everyone else is. I’m leaning towards the latter.
-
[quote name=“randomdef” post=“16088” timestamp=“1371531299”]
[quote author=justabitoftime link=topic=1992.msg16081#msg16081 date=1371529392]
[quote author=randomdef link=topic=1992.msg16079#msg16079 date=1371528989]
does that make your begging any less pathetic?not really, but if being pathetic once was good enough for LTC! then being sad and pathetic twice is what FTC was cloned to do!
[/quote]So this is what the kids call trolling eh?
‘Neat-o’
No-one is this oblivious to the idea of grassroots.
[/quote]It isnt trolling. FTC is a LTC clone, fact. You all stated that you don’t mind the FTC chat and pump because LTC did it.
That’s cool with me, but you can’t say its cool because LTC did it without really hitting home the fact that the entire code base is a carbon copy, WHICH ISNT A BAD THING. You are all very sensitive when you are called out on the truth.
[/quote]I dont see anyone denying the facts you stated. Link?
Also to add to that, how much different is Litecoin really from the Bitcoin source? Seriously? That argument is like saying it is okay that Litecoin basically copied bitcoin, but it isn’t as okay for Feathercoin to copy the litecoin code base.
Can’t have it both ways. This is likely my only gripe with the argument. If the logic is copying is bad, then Litecoin is really no different in [i][b][u]principle [/u][/b][/i]from Feathercoin.
-
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
-
[quote name=“Smoothie” post=“16091” timestamp=“1371531447”]
[quote author=randomdef link=topic=1992.msg16088#msg16088 date=1371531299]
[quote author=justabitoftime link=topic=1992.msg16081#msg16081 date=1371529392]
[quote author=randomdef link=topic=1992.msg16079#msg16079 date=1371528989]
does that make your begging any less pathetic?not really, but if being pathetic once was good enough for LTC! then being sad and pathetic twice is what FTC was cloned to do!
[/quote]So this is what the kids call trolling eh?
‘Neat-o’
No-one is this oblivious to the idea of grassroots.
[/quote]It isnt trolling. FTC is a LTC clone, fact. You all stated that you don’t mind the FTC chat and pump because LTC did it.
That’s cool with me, but you can’t say its cool because LTC did it without really hitting home the fact that the entire code base is a carbon copy, WHICH ISNT A BAD THING. You are all very sensitive when you are called out on the truth.
[/quote]I dont see anyone denying the facts you stated. Link?
Also to add to that, how much different is Litecoin really from the Bitcoin source? Seriously? That argument is like saying it is okay that Litecoin basically copied bitcoin, but it isn’t as okay for Feathercoin to copy the litecoin code base.
Can’t have it both ways. This is likely my only gripe with the argument. If the logic is copying is bad, then Litecoin is really no different in [i][b][u]principle [/u][/b][/i]from Feathercoin.
[/quote]I don’t deny litecoin isn’t any better than bitcoin BUT the discussion was on the #2 status, not the king daddy. Copies of copies and no one can says which is better than which, unless you are holding a very large bag.
-
[quote name=“justabitoftime” post=“16093” timestamp=“1371532063”]
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
[/quote]+1 this is the fundamental view from history of other technology.
Trolls look at it as “well you didnt come up with a totally new code base so your version sucks”. :P
-
Randomdef,
The world is much bigger than you think when it comes to how many “successful” cryptocurrencies there can be as time goes on.
That’s almost like saying that there can only be 2 successful car manufacturers, software companies, ._____ fill in the blank.
The point is this, crypto (Bitcoin-based) is out of the bag. Once the genie is out of the bottle (as it is today) there is no saying how many successful ones there could be. So what if Litecoin gets #2 spot that is fine. Not gripe there. But that shouldnt stop people from starting their own chain and adding their own spin to the code (over time) and give a different community-based feel to its surroundings.
Ultimately People give something value, yes technology has to be sound, but ultimately people (free-market) will determine what is valuable and what isnt.
-
This is like claiming that British engineers working with German engineering would have the same luck as Japanese management types.
“Maybe if we put the smoke back in, it will work again.”
Seriously.
The clone, clone, clone question is a suitable foundation for discussion only if you’ve never had anything but TV dinners.
Bitcoin is Lucid Emacs. Litecoin is GNU HURD. Feathercoin is nano. All pieces of software which had to break off from their roots, not because it was better (it can be), but because the community brought development to a stand still.
Quality comes from adaptability not clever design. If your community is an obstacle, you fork early or give up.
Which community / codebase is going to allow you to achieve your goals? The perfectionist? The tweaker? Or the one where everyone rolls up their sleeves without even thinking about it?
-
Does it matter if the foundation code for all these coins is the same, as long as what is built on top adds value?
Sure, FTC may have the same code underneath as LTC, but the percentage of shared code will slowly go down as we add refinements and features which LTC is not doing, such as the difficulty change limits, the proposed checkpointing solution etc.
Just because two things have the same basis, does not make them the same. A Ferrari and a Fiat have the same basis, share many of the same parts and even are built by pretty much the same people, but Ferraris sell for a huge amount of money because of the perceived added value of being able to drive at 180MPH+ and having the prancing pony on the bonnet. There’s nothing (much) wrong with Fiats, but I’d prefer FTC to aim at the Ferrari end of the spectrum through adoption of newer technology solutions and generating of value of the FTC brand.
-
[quote name=“spynappels” post=“16121” timestamp=“1371548763”]
Does it matter if the foundation code for all these coins is the same, as long as what is built on top adds value?Sure, FTC may have the same code underneath as LTC, but the percentage of shared code will slowly go down as we add refinements and features which LTC is not doing, such as the difficulty change limits, the proposed checkpointing solution etc.
Just because two things have the same basis, does not make them the same. A Ferrari and a Fiat have the same basis, share many of the same parts and even are built by pretty much the same people, but Ferraris sell for a huge amount of money because of the perceived added value of being able to drive at 180MPH+ and having the prancing pony on the bonnet. There’s nothing (much) wrong with Fiats, but I’d prefer FTC to aim at the Ferrari end of the spectrum through adoption of newer technology solutions and generating of value of the FTC brand.
[/quote]+1 what he said ^
-
Feathercoin ‘The Ferrari of Fiat’ < I Like it :)
NM ::)
-
[quote name=“UKMark” post=“16130” timestamp=“1371551624”]
Feathercoin ‘The Ferrari of Fiat’ < I Like it :)NM ::)
[/quote]The ferrari of crypto you mean?
The way i see it is at the beginning ftc was a clone of ltc (nothing wrong with that) yet already there have been changes that differentiate it. Look back at it in another year and see how similar the coin is to ltc. I have a feeling they will only have a passing similarity to each other (especially if the hash algorithm gets changed as well).
-
By the time we’re done, they’ll be using our Leathercoin to push ideas forward.
-
[quote name=“justabitoftime” post=“16093” timestamp=“1371532063”]
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
[/quote]Excellent example. When was the last time an app had 2-6 lines of code changed and then branded as new and spectacular? none, ever. Why? because of the community would have laughed you out the door as a thief and an idiot who brought nothing new to the table. So changing 6 lines of code for feathercoin, and you are surprised by the backlash?
Had the feathercoin client brought something new to the table and amazing, the backlash would not be there.
-
[quote name=“randomdef” post=“16154” timestamp=“1371565143”]
[quote author=justabitoftime link=topic=1992.msg16093#msg16093 date=1371532063]
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
[/quote]Excellent example. When was the last time an app had 2-6 lines of code changed and then branded as new and spectacular? none, ever. Why? because of the community would have laughed you out the door as a thief and an idiot who brought nothing new to the table. So changing 6 lines of code for feathercoin, and you are surprised by the backlash?
Had the feathercoin client brought something new to the table and amazing, the backlash would not be there.
[/quote]I see you mining on pools, I see you still posting quite a lot on here.
I guess you’re just cashing in on the failure of feathercoin. I can see no other reason why you’re still bothering with such an abysmal failure of the theft of a concept…
-
[quote name=“klenker” post=“16160” timestamp=“1371566464”]
[quote author=randomdef link=topic=1992.msg16154#msg16154 date=1371565143]
[quote author=justabitoftime link=topic=1992.msg16093#msg16093 date=1371532063]
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
[/quote]Excellent example. When was the last time an app had 2-6 lines of code changed and then branded as new and spectacular? none, ever. Why? because of the community would have laughed you out the door as a thief and an idiot who brought nothing new to the table. So changing 6 lines of code for feathercoin, and you are surprised by the backlash?
Had the feathercoin client brought something new to the table and amazing, the backlash would not be there.
[/quote]I see you mining on pools, I see you still posting quite a lot on here.
I guess you’re just cashing in on the failure of feathercoin. I can see no other reason why you’re still bothering with such an abysmal failure of the theft of a concept…
[/quote]Oh the irony, CASHING in on failure.
Hmm :P
-
woof its gettin hot in here
-
[quote name=“randomdef” post=“16154” timestamp=“1371565143”]
[quote author=justabitoftime link=topic=1992.msg16093#msg16093 date=1371532063]
100s of Linux distributions, small incremental changes and experimentation helped it evolve. Certain Linux flavors gained more success than others by the services and support that surrounded the distribution.
[/quote]Excellent example. When was the last time an app had 2-6 lines of code changed and then branded as new and spectacular? none, ever. Why? because of the community would have laughed you out the door as a thief and an idiot who brought nothing new to the table. So changing 6 lines of code for feathercoin, and you are surprised by the backlash?
Had the feathercoin client brought something new to the table and amazing, the backlash would not be there.
[/quote]New and amazing is a depressingly poor and irrelevant argument.
It’s an imaginary Ayn Rand, Willy Wonka universe where everything is new and exciting, like the Love Boat.
It’s also pointless because clearly Litecoin no longer gets that backlash, so why should ours?X.org vs X11R6
GNU Emacs vs XEmacs
Harmony vs QT
Status.net vs Twitter
pico vs nanoThe changes are enough to fundamentally change the compatibility of the coin, therefore it is reasonable to change the name.
