[Dev] NeoScrypt GPU Miner - Public Beta Test
-
fucking awesome! +35%
I know; I used some of my own code to fix it - and it happened to require several things fixed.
-
Family forum boys and girls! Curb the language please
UM
-
I know; I used some of my own code to fix it - and it happened to require several things fixed.
some stability issues with your kernel, crashes like in 3-4hours
-
some stability issues with your kernel, crashes like in 3-4hours
Does it happen on reasonably new drivers? I’m on 14.9 and haven’t had it crash yet.
-
Ups, only read the last two messages here after merging Wolf0’s kernel into the master-branch. So master-github is now on 3.7.8 including wolf’s current kernel.
I have tested it on an Nvidia GPU and had no issues, but running only for short periods of time. Let’s monitor that.
-
i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0
-
i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0
All right; give it another go and I’ll leave mine going.
-
i think 14.9 doesnt like my high gpu clocks…
yes, seems it was my only elpida card crashed
so i think this is more related to elpida card on 14.9 than this new kernel( of course elpida will be pushed harder with new kernel with 14.9)
i dropped clocks by 10mhz for now
added 2>logfile.txt to my conf, is it good to log all needed?
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
- would also like to have one.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Oddly, even on my own in-dev kernel, my 290X at 1125/1600 (memory type unknown) does 250kh/s, while my Hynix 280X does 255kh/s - 265kh/s at 1150/1500… weird.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Awesome thanks, up to 150kh/s now on R9 280x.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
-
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
-
So how do we get a copy of this in-dev kernel? LoL
-
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
Yes, I know you can’t - because it’s a half-rewritten kernel that I’m using. Not the 14.9 fixed one.
-
So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.
-
So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.
Want my settings for different cards?
