[Dev] NeoScrypt GPU Miner - Public Beta Test
-
i think 14.9 doesnt like my high gpu clocks…
yes, seems it was my only elpida card crashed
so i think this is more related to elpida card on 14.9 than this new kernel( of course elpida will be pushed harder with new kernel with 14.9)
i dropped clocks by 10mhz for now
added 2>logfile.txt to my conf, is it good to log all needed?
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
- would also like to have one.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Oddly, even on my own in-dev kernel, my 290X at 1125/1600 (memory type unknown) does 250kh/s, while my Hynix 280X does 255kh/s - 265kh/s at 1150/1500… weird.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Awesome thanks, up to 150kh/s now on R9 280x.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
-
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
-
So how do we get a copy of this in-dev kernel? LoL
-
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
Yes, I know you can’t - because it’s a half-rewritten kernel that I’m using. Not the 14.9 fixed one.
-
So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.
-
So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.
Want my settings for different cards?
-
Absolutely… :) I’m getting pretty decent performance bumps from my 7950’s by tweaking the settings, but my 290’s aren’t doing much better than they already were.
-
Just in case some of you haven’t seen them before, my screenshots are NSFW.
My mixed card rig, Freya, with card types and settings shown (you won’t get the same hash, but the settings should work well): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11022014-2.png
-
Just in case some of you haven’t seen them before, my screenshots are NSFW.
My mixed card rig, Freya, with card types and settings shown (you won’t get the same hash, but the settings should work well): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11022014-2.png
Looks pretty uncluttered, except for those “want” icons… ;)
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Tested this with Nvidia 560m I’m see no improvement, actually I’m seeing a 1.02kh/s loss using 3.7.8
used same command line as I was with 3.7.7c, still testing will try new settings next.
–neoscrypt --no-submit-stale -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0 -I 10 -w 32
-
Tested this with Nvidia 560m I’m see no improvement, actually I’m seeing a 1.02kh/s loss using 3.7.8
It works - as for the loss, it’s not exactly intended for Nvidia; my main target is AMD Graphics Core Next - that is, every AMD card 7xxx series and up.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
On those 290’s, kick the core clock up to 1130 and the memory clock up to 1495, you will see a substantial boost in speed, and almost no change in temps.
I haven’t found a way to get my 290x (XFX) to accept overclocking settings from afterburner yet. But it without o/c settings, the 290x and the 2 290’s using those settings are running 150 kh each. 78c, 80, and 84c (the 84c is a on triple fan GPU that one of the fans fell off of at some point in time)
More tweaking later, gotta go mow the lawn.
Oh, and thanks Wolf0 for digging in and offering the improvements!!
-
It works - as for the loss, it’s not exactly intended for Nvidia; my main target is AMD Graphics Core Next - that is, every AMD card 7xxx series and up.
Yea late night, just woke a short while ago and setting in front of my laptop and haven’t made it to the shop yet to test on my R9 270’s or 6970’s.
I’m sure I will see some improvement with those once tested. Thanks for working with this project.
