Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    FTCVanity.exe

    Projects
    10
    65
    45417
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • U
      UKMark last edited by

      [quote name=“Markus1337” post=“5014” timestamp=“1369165388”]
      [quote author=UKMark link=topic=489.msg4908#msg4908 date=1369137655]
      v1.07 (v1.06 never made official release :) )

      [b]Changelog:[/b]
      Added settings menu.
      Can now be configured to generate vanity addresses for Feathercoin, Litecoin & Bitcoin.
      Added [i]run once[/i] self configuration on first run, this is basically a short test to measure system performance of the PC FTCVanity is installed on. this is to enable trouble free operation even on the slowest of PC’s. < That’s the plan anyway :)
      Edit: Also vanitygen, vanitygen64 & oclvanitygen now start minimised, so if you wish to see progress output on longer patterns, etc, simply double click the black CMD window in the systray.

      Will update the Github source later on today, Download link updated in OP along with new screenshots added.
      [/quote] good work mate, keep going ;)
      [/quote]

      Just a few little buggy bug things left to sort and the jobs a gudun as they say in the trade, well the building trade anyway :)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • U
        UKMark last edited by

        v1.09

        [b]Changelog:[/b]

        99.9% bug free, I would say 100% but that would be tempting fate.
        Improved initial once only benchmarking configuration script to take an average over 5 iterations of the test, this gives a far more accurate result to enable configuration for system performance differences down to milliseconds.

        …And that’s it really, don’t think I can take this much further now, apart from maybe an auto import key feature, when/if the client becomes more accessible.

        Many thanks to everyone who contributed with feedback and a BIG thanks to Markus1337 for his bug reporting an improvement ideas/suggestions. 8)

        Enjoy! :)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M
          Markus1337 Regular Member last edited by

          [quote name=“UKMark” post=“5554” timestamp=“1369255415”]
          v1.09

          [b]Changelog:[/b]

          99.9% bug free, I would say 100% but that would be tempting fate.
          Improved initial once only benchmarking configuration script to take an average over 5 iterations of the test, this gives a far more accurate result to enable configuration for system performance differences down to milliseconds.

          …And that’s it really, don’t think I can take this much further now, apart from maybe an auto import key feature, when/if the client becomes more accessible.

          Many thanks to everyone who contributed with feedback and a BIG thanks to Markus1337 for his bug reporting an improvement ideas/suggestions. 8)

          Enjoy! :)
          [/quote] Very good job you did there Mark! OpenCL (GPU) seems stable for my PC and almost doubled the key/s rate compared to the CPU. Anyone interested it is really worth checking it out 8)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            Kevlar Spammer last edited by

            I was having some problems with 1.07, but 1.09 seems to be quite awesome.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • U
              UKMark last edited by

              [quote name=“Kevlar” post=“5882” timestamp=“1369342633”]
              I was having some problems with 1.07, but 1.09 seems to be quite awesome.
              [/quote]

              Brilliant news, thanks for the FB 8)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • U
                UKMark last edited by

                Looks like v1.10 is just around the corner…

                [img]http://mtgoxlagometer.herobo.com/bug.PNG[/img]

                While this does not affect functionality, its a tad confusing to say the least :D

                I simply forgot to add the $name variable to the error message box, I will sort and push later! 8)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • U
                  UKMark last edited by

                  v1.10 ^^Above minor bug now fixed:

                  [img]http://mtgoxlagometer.herobo.com/buggone.PNG[/img]

                  That makes a bit more sense now :)

                  OP installer.exe link updated, I will update source later on today.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ghostlander
                    ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                    If a wallet is encrypted, type in the console before importing a private key:

                    [code]walletpassphrase YourPassword Seconds[/code]

                    Unlocks the wallet for a number of seconds specified, continue with importprivkey as usual.
                    dumpprivkey shows it for a given address, proceed as above for encrypted wallets.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • U
                      UKMark last edited by

                      [quote name=“ghostlander” post=“6203” timestamp=“1369430629”]
                      If a wallet is encrypted, type in the console before importing a private key:

                      [code]walletpassphrase YourPassword Seconds[/code]

                      Unlocks the wallet for a number of seconds specified, continue with importprivkey as usual.
                      dumpprivkey shows it for a given address, proceed as above for encrypted wallets.
                      [/quote]

                      Awesome! thanks for this, I don’t suppose you know of way to import into the client (not daemon) via cmd and without setting it up as a server? I just want to fully offer a one app does all tbh without too much user intervention…

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ghostlander
                        ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                        Hmm, didn’t try it that way…

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • U
                          UKMark last edited by

                          [quote name=“ghostlander” post=“6318” timestamp=“1369476277”]
                          Hmm, didn’t try it that way…
                          [/quote]

                          No worries, I have tried various routes and always come up blank on this. :(

                          Anyway I have added your useful info to the OP, thanks again for sharing! 8)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ?
                            A Former User last edited by

                            Does this actually work?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • U
                              UKMark last edited by

                              [quote name=“jamesgarfield” post=“6557” timestamp=“1369538441”]
                              Does this actually work?
                              [/quote]

                              It works for me and others…If you are having issues then post below…

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ghostlander
                                ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                                [b]“This installation requires Windows Vista/7/8. Installation cannot continue.”[/b]

                                That sucks very much.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • U
                                  UKMark last edited by

                                  [quote name=“ghostlander” post=“8375” timestamp=“1370015942”]
                                  [b]“This installation requires Windows Vista/7/8. Installation cannot continue.”[/b]

                                  That sucks very much.
                                  [/quote]

                                  It was never tested on XP so I removed it from the installer configuration, but you are welcome to try:

                                  Let me know…

                                  Edit: [Link Removed] Doesn’t work on XP or 2003

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ghostlander
                                    ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                                    I’m on 2003 R2 x64, though XP is not much different when it comes to desktop use. The installation is quick and easy now.

                                    [img]http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/8084/ftcvanity.png[/img]

                                    I guess there must be some kind of logo. In general, works fine.

                                    [b]“ERROR!! FALSE POSITIVE DETECTED!!”[/b]

                                    Yep, me knows how to screw up software :)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • U
                                      UKMark last edited by

                                      I take it I was right with just allowing Vista, 7 & 8 then ;D
                                      Weird how the logo won’t display, as the Background and Logo are both base64 :-\
                                      Oh well thanks for testing, looks like it will have to suck though. :)

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ghostlander
                                        ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                                        Well, it generates addresses/keys on my 2003 actually. The client validates them with no problem. I’ve catched a few false positives while playing with some weird patterns such as 71/72/73. If you fix the logo thing, it’s all right.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • U
                                          UKMark last edited by

                                          [quote name=“ghostlander” post=“8396” timestamp=“1370025438”]
                                          Well, it generates addresses/keys on my 2003 actually. The client validates them with no problem. I’ve catched a few false positives while playing with some weird patterns such as 71/72/73. If you fix the logo thing, it’s all right.
                                          [/quote]

                                          Arrr yeah 7’s they are a bit hit and miss :)

                                          OK, I [i]think[/i] it may be a .png problem as that is the only noticiable difference between both images (BG & Logo), so I have updated the Logo to a gif - Base64 so it is now exactly the same as the Matrix background.
                                          Other than that I am totally lost as I don’t have the means to debug this solo :(

                                          Anyway, fingers crossed:

                                          [url=https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5rwxlWy7MtLT2RwMHJncTZsR1U/edit?usp=sharing]FTCVanity_v1.10_XP_Test_v2.exe
                                          [/url]
                                          Let me know…

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ghostlander
                                            ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                                            No difference, must be something else. Although you can simply remove it for the XP/2003 build.

                                            [img]http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/2586/ftcvanity2.png[/img]

                                            I guess that’s because I’m using 120 DPI fonts while most people are comfortable with 96 DPI ones, but you can add some bottom space to the Settings window anyway.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post