[quote name=“bitcoinerS” post=“32041” timestamp=“1382336484”]
[quote author=erk link=topic=4120.msg32035#msg32035 date=1382324813]
The Monarch is too risky, the list of reasons is long an too tedious to go into here. If I was the OP I would cancel the Mornarch order and get a refund a.s.a.p. if that is even possible.
[/quote]

I think a Monarch is a great investment, I bought a bunch for myself and this offer is a good opportunity to save from retail price and get next generation mining card.
[/quote]

It could be a good investment if not a pre-order. It may be worth nearly nothing by the delivery time. A local guy has offered me some ~300GH/s BitFury ASICs recently at 0.1 BTC per 1GH/s. A waste of money even though he delivers the same day. He has reduced the price after the last retarget on the 17-Oct by about 40%. I guess he will be selling them at a half of this price after the next retarget.

Gz all 8)

I think moving the Feathercoin Market is the best plan, keep the forum focus.

We should then tell the churches we have made / are making that effort and get them back on board. The donations shows the ease and possibility and of donations for other uses as well as for the church. Which can be of a social security than religious in some countries, more than perhaps here in the UK.

I want someone to start an FTC mine in the cloud :P

i’ll pay [img]http://thebitcoinreview.com/feathercoin_price_img.php?output=ftc&amount=350[/img]

;D

[quote name=“lizhi” post=“31663” timestamp=“1382107477”]
Run mingw32-make -f makefile.mingw . success. I get a file,It is feathercoind.exe . feathercoind.exe size 56.15MB.
It needs to access the file \AppData\Roaming\Feathercoin\feathercoin.conf.
it has what? What does that do ?
[/quote]

This is the daemon. Works like the Qt client minus GUI. Managed through the RPC interface once started. Commands are the same used in the Qt client’s debug console. Type “feathercoind help” if in doubt.

P.S. It is ~5Mb if compiled with no debug data.

[quote name=“wrapper0feather” post=“31818” timestamp=“1382194677”]
[quote] Here is a graph of our network hash rate and difficulty for the last 2 weeks. We’ve had about 1.7GH/s of loyal miners and 9GH/s (12GH/s peak) of coin hoppers. 15% vs. 85% [/quote]

That’s a great graph of the Feathercoin Hash Rate and Difficulty (Ghostlander), can we have it live on the forum or, every 2 weeks? How’s the change to 0.6.4.4 effected the Hash Rate, since September?
[/quote]

Multipool uses HighCharts.com to generate these graphs. I guess we can, too. Their service is free for personal or non-profit use.

[quote name=“mnstrcck” post=“31758” timestamp=“1382133264”]
User lizhi is from Chongqing - so maybe we can PM and see if he could help us out with a translation?
Looks like the predominant dialect in Chongqing is Sichuanese Mandarin but chances are he’s got Standard Mandarin nailed down. Chris?
[/quote]

Great idea. Go ahead and ask him.

[quote name=“adamstgbit” post=“31595” timestamp=“1382047231”]
[quote author=Kevlar link=topic=4088.msg31594#msg31594 date=1382046659]
[quote author=adamstgbit link=topic=4088.msg31581#msg31581 date=1382042433]
I dont get it, they plan to do p2p trading BTC/USD over the internet?

thats not possible!

you need a 3rd party to deal with the USD, no?
[/quote]

Yes, it’s possible… yes you need a third party for the USD part.

Immagine the following scenario:

Party A has USD to trade, Party B has BTC to trade.

A bank or other money transmitter (bitalo.com in this case) publishes their public signing key. We will call them Party C.

Party B, the owner of the BTC, creates a 2 of 2 multisig transaction for X amount of BTC requiring party B’s sig, AND party C’s sig. He signs it, and publishes the transaction for all to see, along with the terms of the agreement (the price he’s willing to trade his X BTC for, which is Y USD).

Party C picks up this transaction, and says, “Ok, I’ll broker this deal, send your USD here, and when you do, I’ll sign the transaction.” Party A wires their funds to Party C. Party C signs the transaction, adding Party A’s address, and broadcasts it, and wires Party B the USD.

What’s interesting about this protocol is that ANYONE can play the role of party C. So, it’s about who you trust. You could do this with a 2 of 15 transaction, where the other 14 are ALL the participating exchanges that you trust, and any one of the exchanges can fulfill the trade without you depositing your funds with them.
[/quote]

well there you go, its not peer to peer, all this does is make the process way more complex than it needs to be
Bitalo WILL be the trusted 3rd party and will need to comply with regulation like every other “centralized” exchange.
I would be more excited to see BTC traded with FTC without any need for 3rd party whatsoever. NO MORE FIAT, WE DON’T NEED THAT S&*%
[/quote]

Multi-sig transactions are the answer for that too. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Distributed_markets

[quote name=“HopeStillFlies” post=“31469” timestamp=“1381966076”]
I’m seriously not going to take anyone up on their offer of giving me FTC for selling something for… FTC.

The marketplace with it’s tiny fees is reward for listing stuff in itself.
[/quote]

+1 :)

Nice blog solasaurus :)

really hoping for bitcoin to do another spike up so i can get cheap FTC!

Article about post unocs development with focus on granurality, market and meetup with this video inside.
@coidesk

=Way to gain more views.

Feathercoin user not affected 8)

[quote name=“tuneman1980” post=“31403” timestamp=“1381926314”]
I might be able to lend a hand…
[/quote]

I thought you might so I added you to the Project :)

The Feathercoin explorer went down yesterday. For a backup go to the one that ghostlander listed. Or, as he suggests use ABE which is what we currently use. It is an opensource project and can be obtained from the link below.

https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe

[quote name=“lizhi” post=“31375” timestamp=“1381890782”]
A little frustrated. Today , I withdrawals 100 FTC from the Exchange, 6 confirmed need 20 minutes.
This will affect the user experience.Needs attention.
[/quote]

It was only recently when you had to wait half a day for lodgement to an exchange, 20 minutes sounds excellent in comparison.

[quote name=“chrisj” post=“31362” timestamp=“1381879463”]
[quote author=adamstgbit link=topic=4056.msg31361#msg31361 date=1381879245]
[quote author=chrisj link=topic=4056.msg31360#msg31360 date=1381879020]
[quote author=adamstgbit link=topic=4056.msg31358#msg31358 date=1381878823]
[url=http://featheraddress.org/]http://featheraddress.org/[/url] paper wallets all the way!
[/quote]

But what if the CPU farts an electron and the public private key pair don’t match? You put your coins on to the public key and you think they are safe but then one day when you import the private key you find out that there’s a problem and they didn’t match after all?

I mean I know the odds must be extremely low but I think about stuff like this
[/quote]

hmm i didnt know their was a chance that could happen

well spread it out on a few paper wallets and you limit this tiny risk.

encrypted with the client is fine too.
[/quote]

But before it’s encrypted the key is stored in plain text no? Meaning there is window of opportunity. Also when it is encrypted I don’t think the original data is wiped with multi pass so it’s still on your machine somewhere.

Diversity is the most important thing, so spreading coins out is good.
[/quote]
but you can load a live linux and use the webpage offline.